Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harling Mural Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 20:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harling Mural Art[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently an autobiography. User already blocked on three other projects for self-promotion. All the sources are basically crap, social media and the like. I don't see basically anything in English. Possible there are non-English sources, but given that they have been blocked on id.wiki as a sock of an account blocked for promotion (see [1]) it doesn't inspire confidence. GMG ^talk 20:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Autobiographical article (as per page history) is promotional, lacking in reliable sources and fails notability criteria. Netherzone (talk) 20:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I removed wordpress, instagram, wikiquote... the whole Smorgasbord of unreliable sources. The earlier version could be an example page for what is not a WP:RS. Promotional, GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (possible speedy A7): A WP:SPA autobiography which is not making credible claim to notability, supported by poor references. (There is also a Draft:Harling Bassukarno - more detailed biographically but still lacking credible referenced notability.) AllyD (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of drafts, a copy of the article is here on a user page.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. - MA Javadi (talk) 22:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment what looks to be a related editor just went through the article and added their signature to every section.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They keep doing it, they seem to really want to see their sig in the article, or they do not understand signatures. It is promotional editing.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - totally lacking significant coverage. Wikipedia does not create art history. Even if they were notable, we frown heavily on autobiographies and hold them to higher standards. We are a charity, not a free web-host for for-profit entrepreneurs, nor are we an online graffitto mural. The creator's edits border on vandalism. Bearian (talk) 15:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian:I think it's a language issue leading to CIR, in terms of the creator's edits. The top of their talk page has a nice note in Indonesian about the tea room invite. Well-intentioned, but autobiographical, not notable and lacking editing competence.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is nothing more than vanity spam. Praxidicae (talk) 16:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. - MA Javadi (talk) 22:38, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: c:Category:Sockpuppets of Harling Mural. And Draft:Semar Gugat Supersemar can be deleted on the fly. --Achim (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.